Table of Contents: February 2001

Next: What About Homework?


Link to: February 2001 Issue pdf. file format (best for printing)


Home  Library Join 

Helping you make sense of schooling today Feb.  2000 • Vol.  3 • Issue 1 M                                               y husband
                                              and I
                                              recently put
our oldest son in an all-boys
school. It was a hard decision.
After all, both of us went to
“normal” mixed-gender public
schools and we turned out
okay. If we sent him, we
wondered, would he turn into
a character from Lord of the
Flies?   Would he become impervious to women, self-
absorbed, and disconnected
from the real world?
        Our reasons were many,
but the decision came down to
two major factors: 1) our boy
wasn’t being respected as a
boy and 2) the curriculum at
the new school appeared more
mindful of the fact that boys
and girls do differ.
        Thus in one of his first
weeks at his new school, a
science lesson was accompa-
nied by a visit outside the class-
room.  Rather than one recess
period a day and gym only
twice a week, our fifth grader
got daily physical education
and two recesses per day.
        But the biggest impact
became apparent within a few
months.  Ever the social, talka-
tive, and rather not-engaged-
in-academics kid, our boy was
suddenly engaged, challenged,
and thus, not nearly as talka-
tive in class.  The rich
curriculum, complete with
hands-on battles for history,
earth-digging for science and
competitions in math, coupled
with a larger pool of boys that
doesn’t get chastised at every
turn, let us know that for this
boy, this was the right decision.
        Oh, it’s not perfect, and it’s
not for everyone.  And because
of my close ties to our other
school community, I was still
troubled with my decision.
Then I visited the Women’s
Leadership Academy in Harlem,
New York, an all–girls public
school started by entrepreneurs
Ann and Andrew Tisch.
Leaders at WLA talked about
how much these teen-age girls
in this difficult urban setting
were finding great indepen-
dence, creativity and confidence
without boys as an impedi-
ment.  I asked the director her
thoughts about single-sex
education.  She responded that
clearly, it’s not for everyone.
She told me about one parent
who, after pulling her daughter
following only a few weeks,
commented that she liked the
school but it wasn’t for her
daughter.  “We’ve lost a few
girls,” says principal Judith
Scott,  “And that’s okay.”
        It is okay to decide that the
school you’ve enrolled your
child in is not bringing out her
best.  It is okay to suggest that
perhaps not every school is
working its best to understand
the differences we share.  Often
the difference is as fundamental
as a learning style, or it could
be because of innate differences
between boys and girls.
Whatever the driving force, the
programs and curriculum abun-
dant in public schools and
many parochial schools are
overwhelmingly feminine.
They approach education in
cooperative groups, putting
boys and girls facing each other
at tables, expecting that boys
will cooperate.
        Some books — now even
in math and science — are
laced with extensive word
problems so that children with
auditory or visual processing
issues (more prevalent in
boys) become a mess trying to
figure out exactly what the
problem is asking them to do.
And more often than not, the
basic human nature of boys is
questioned as they fiddle, stare
out the window, use their
hands to push and wrestle.
Those environments send a
signal that it’s not okay to be
yourself, and try to fit square
pegs into round holes.
        Women’s school leaders say
that the heterosexual environ-
ment impedes a girl’s confidence
and causes her to suppress what
may be hiding inside.
        For these and other
reasons, increasing numbers of
educators are heralding the
return of single sex schools.
One of the first single sex
charter schools in the country
was approved by the New York
Board of Regents in December
2000.  The Brighter Choice
Charter School will offer single
sex classes to both boys and
girls in Albany, New York.
        Meanwhile, our next two
boys are “candidates” for
single sex education. We
struggle daily trying to deter-
mine if both or either of their
personalities are well-suited
for this school, or at least
better-suited than their present
environment. It’s a struggle all
parents should have, however,
and one that whatever our
decision, will have been worth
it in the end.
The Growing Support for Single Sex Schools FROM THE PUBLISHER