A NATION STILL AT RISK? RESULTS FROM THE LATEST NAEP

Fall 2022
29TH ANNIVERSARY EDITION​
And They’re Off! 29 Years and Counting:
How CER Went from a Longshot to Placing Bets on the Best

Dear Friends:


I remember turning 29. I had just had my first child—a son—and I felt very much in the joyful prime of my life.

I would start CER a few years later, buoyed by local and state advocates and officials I supported in my work at the Heritage Foundation, but being asked right and left to do more for them than a think tank—at that time—would allow.

One of them—now outgoing Massachusetts Governor Charlie Baker recently reminded me of that. “Didn’t I used to call you asking for help with our education work?” He was referring to his time at the Pioneer Institute—and, yes, you did, Charlie.

He and others would leave their comfortable policy positions for elected office and forge a critical path to reforming a system that, once the envy of the world, had gone on to become an international embarrassment—the very epitome of a nation at risk, as the later report by the same name would echo.


Gov. Charlie Baker was advocating for educational options nearly 30 years ago—just one of dozens whose support, whether achieved in policy or not, would be a contributing factor to the later success of Governors like Arizona’s Doug Ducey.

OUT OF THE GATE

It was against that backdrop—a growing frustration by both parties, parents of all stripes and a great media sector—that I started CER, once the only horse like it in the field, and one that only a few initially would bet on. It was a dark horse idea—leave the well-heeled national organizations and start one focused on helping cross pollinate the seeds that were spreading to expand freedom, flexibility and restore excellence to American education. And to the surprise of many, the horse came out of the gate strong—it took off, growing and helping to spark the creation of new groups, engender the envy of others, and even survive too many attempts to put us out of business—why? because we wanted to break out of the pack, not stand aside and let those with perceived pedigrees tell us what to do. As more people tried to knock us off the horse, we ran faster, smarter, harder, and with fewer resources than most.

And then a great thing happened. More followed our lead, started their own groups dedicated to parent empowerment, grassroots, policy and advocacy. Many of them were safe bets, comfortable, easy to predict. Not CER. We remained unpredictable, opportunistic, and ready at the sound of the bell to challenge unhelpful jockeys on the field no matter whose side they were riding. Along the way we would meet many other people who also liked betting on underdogs like us, who were not risk averse and they became committed to the cause of education opportunity, and new transformational approaches to the old arcane system of doing things.

I ran into a former Georgia state legislator at an event not too long ago who told me the work we did convinced him to fight to improve his state’s charter school law, and he stayed the course until he succeeded. Doing so encouraged other states to follow suit. When one person wins a tough race and shows it can be done, others follow. Not enough yet, but they do.

And so the movement for education reform became the movement for even more opportunity and innovation (as we said in 2016) which was at the right place at the right time when Covid struck. The blended learning and virtual models of success that had been tested and improved greatly in the prior ten years were ready for prime time. The ed tech revolution had sparked a whole new set of approaches to teaching and fueling more learning, and new and exciting education choice programs were making their way through the states, thanks to a new movement of parent choice groups, advocates who were constantly sharpening their tools, and a frustrated public hungry for more options.

And so the movement for education reform became the movement for even more opportunity and innovation (as we said in 2016) which was at the right place at the right time when Covid struck. The blended learning and virtual models of success that had been tested and improved greatly in the prior ten years were ready for prime time. The ed tech revolution had sparked a whole new set of approaches to teaching and fueling more learning, and new and exciting education choice programs were making their way through the states, thanks to a new movement of parent choice groups, advocates who were constantly sharpening their tools, and a frustrated public hungry for more options.

Unbroken

And then a great thing happened. More followed our lead, started their own groups dedicated to parent empowerment, grassroots, policy and advocacy. Many of them were safe bets, comfortable, easy to predict. Not CER. We remained unpredictable, opportunistic, and ready at the sound of the bell to challenge unhelpful jockeys on the field no matter whose side they were riding. Along the way we would meet many other people who also liked betting on underdogs like us, who were not risk averse and they became committed to the cause of education opportunity, and new transformational approaches to the old arcane system of doing things.

Discovery Center of Springfield (MO)—one of only two U.S. science centers not to shut down during Covid—was a museum that became a school for children in need. It also took top honors in the inaugural STOP Awards in 2021.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 

Return to parent issue