Sign up for our newsletter

Newswire – May 15, 2018

REFLECTIONS. Last week America celebrated National Charter Schools Week. In the 27 years since the founding of the charter school movement, tremendous progress has been made in the number of schools established, and in the wealth of innovative opportunities they offer to children, families, teachers and communities.

Each day of NCSW, schools, educators, advocates and thought leaders produced a combo of thousands of stories, data points and reflections about the role charters have played in transforming how public education works. Parents, policy advocates, legislators – and some of brightest minds in the areas of education technology, pedagogy, curriculum, teaching and learning have helped create a vibrant environment for student success among more than 3 million students who annually benefit from charter school education. As we reported last week however, despite that success, the reality is charters are “Opportunities Under Siege.” We took an unflinching look at the forces and foes that could jeopardize all the hard-fought victories and advancement of the innovation and opportunity that 7,000 charter schools have delivered.

Checkout our NCSW microsite full of resources, daily releases, Op-Eds, media engagement, and the Reality Check with Jeanne Allen podcasts with pioneers and advocates such as Success Academy founder Eva Moskowitz, charter innovator, scholar and author, Sarah Tantillo and respected pioneer who participated in the birth of the modern Charter School Movement, Howard Fuller. We explored the drivers of change, diversity and world-class education and those who strive to un-do this vital work. Our goals for this week were to galvanize charter school educators and administrators against teachers’ union pressures for strikes and walkouts, dispel false claims to set the record straight in the mediareenergize parents and students, and bring urgency to legislators to pass strong charter laws and fund the ones already passed.

LOOMING STORM CLOUDS IN NORTH CAROLINA gather as union-backed strikes are scheduled for Wednesday May 16th in Raleigh with attendance expected to be high. This is another in a wave of coordinated efforts to engage charter school teachers to abandon their classrooms and their students under the façade of solidarity to suit their own agenda, optics and ultimately their coffers. This is the fifth in a series of walk-outs and sick-outs being encouraged by the National Education Association (NEA). The first was in West Virginia and lasted nine days. Subsequently, the NEA encouraged teachers in Oklahoma to walk, even though they won a 16 percent raise from the Oklahoma legislature before the nine-day walk-outs even began. Then there was Kentucky, followed by Arizona where new money for schools was already on the table prior to that walk-out as well.

A WORD TO ALL CHARTER EDUCATORS: While we appreciate that teachers are naturally collaborators, this national walk-out strategy is designed to undermine the very freedoms that charter schools afford not only their families but all who work there. The NEA believes all charters should fall under the same rules as traditional public schools, which, in effect, would make them no different than traditional schools. They fight charter schools in school halls and state halls. They are calling it a walk-out because the public does not like strikes, and they have poll-tested the words. (The NEA spends $34 million a year on its communications.) And they are calling it a walk-out because they don’t have the authority to make anyone do anything in a right-to-work state. However, this is a strike, plain and simple. And by striking with the union, you are joining the fight to close charter schools.

 

THE CASE FOR EDUCATION TRANSFORMATION: CER released the second in a three-part series for The Case for Education Transformation – Opportunity. Following last month’s release of Part I– The Disappointing Reality of American Education, which included 2018 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) alarming data revealing that the lowest performing students in the nation are faring worse than they did on the same assessment in 2015. Part II also assesses what a new opportunity agenda should look like and presents a strategic road map to achieve it.

CER SALUTES 20 YEARS OF EMPOWERING FAMILIES. The Children’s Scholarship Fund is 20 years old, and celebrates this milestone tonight in NYC. If you are in New York City – COME! Tickets are available to join the celebration and special memories of visionary founders Ted Forstmann and John Walton. And at CSF’s helm for the entire 20 years the organization has been supporting more than 166,000 students with scholarships is president and chief operating officer, Darla Romfo. We spoke with her on this week’s Reality Check with Jeanne Allen. Hear why even with today’s availability of greater educational choices, Darla says CFS’s work is more important than ever, “It’s still the right thing to do – to keep trying to make a difference,” she urges, “You can never give up.”

Opportunities + Innovation = Results

National Charter Schools Week 2018 Day 6

This is a country built on innovation, but when it comes to education we are far too cautious. We do not need a thousand flowers to bloom, as the saying goes. What we need is to have a thousand (or tens of thousands) of seeds planted. Those that are watered by parents and students and teachers, with money and time and loyalty, will succeed. The rest will become part of the fertile soil that will make more and better innovations possible in the future.

 The best and quickest path to unleash innovation is opportunity. Opportunities afforded today to communities thanks to charter schools, allows citizens to take control of their destinies, creating new avenues and alternatives to the tired systems of the past. Charter schools have transformed the education landscape and are continuing to serve as the driving force in reshaping and redefining education in America. Parents’ demands for access to new educational options for their children are being met. And millions of children are seeing doors of opportunity open.

 

Just in time to cap off National Charter Schools Week, 2018 comes the release of an important new report about these impacts.  The second in a three-part series, The Case for Education Transformation, Part II: Opportunity, argues for a shift not unlike that begun by charter schools in1991, to provide widespread educational opportunity in the U.S. It offers a real understanding of what a new opportunity agenda should look like, offers recommendations for federal and state policy makers, opportunity advocates, teachers, parents, and students.

But if research isn’t your thing, how about examples of how opportunity and innovation together have fueled a movement?

Appletree Early Learning in Washington DC leverages charter school autonomy to provide exceptional, high quality early learning. Blended learning once a novelty, is now a mainstay not only at many charters but in traditional education, thanks to groups like Rocketship EducationPhoenix Academies in Massachusetts is a small network serving disengaged learners to get them to and through college (dropouts, justice system-involved, teen parents). High Tech High in California has 13 high schools offering a project-based learning approach, teacher credentialing program and graduate school of education. Idea Public Schools has more than 60 pre-k-12 schools across Texas where 100 percent of seniors are college bound. Even back-to-basics can be novel again, as the experience of as BASIS: Arizona charter schools, which garnered top spots in US News and World Report’s Top 10 high schools in 2018, shows us.

But even these are too few and far between to ensure that all children, and learners at all levels, have access to exceptional education, fueled by student centered programs and funding, and untethered to zip codes and other barriers to entry.

As we’ve often said, it shouldn’t take a hurricane to realizes the potential for transformation across a grand scale.  Tragically, in 2005, Hurricane Katrina washed away much of the city’s education infrastructure. In the wake of the widespread destruction of property and the massive exodus of people, the state of Louisiana, with the help of education reformers, created autonomous charter schools to fill the void.

For education reformers — the people who dreamed of remaking not only schools, but reimagining school districts and entire education systems — New Orleans reminds us what is possible. The fact that schools have autonomy and parents have choices has helped to make the entire city a hotbed of innovation—from teacher training to curriculum to the use of technology in the classroom.

This is the closest we have come to realizing the groundbreaking vision of education innovator Ted Kolderie. Few imagined his prescription for creating new, responsive schools in the spirit of choice, innovation, and diversity would evolve into a nationwide movement. Describing the passage of Minnesota’s original charter law back in 1991, former state senator and bill author Ember Reichgott Junge explains, “Chartering trades regulation for results, bureaucracy for accountability, and we weren’t used to doing things like that. Resistance came from everywhere.

Thanks to the moral leadership of national advocates and the hard work of thousands the signs of success are everywhere. Charter schools are no longer a marginal experiment in U.S. education. In more than a dozen cities, charter schools educate 30% of or more of all public school students and are creating a ripple effect uplifting entire education systems, and seating supportive education leaders who helped create alternative opportunities in positions of authority at local and state levels.

And yet, if we as a nation are to be honest with ourselves, we must acknowledge that our efforts to drive change are meeting more resistance daily. Opportunities and Innovation about, but they are under siege. As discussed this week the data, demand and results are conclusive.

Along with the celebrations, however, we must face the challenges – and fight.

The Case for Education Transformation, Part II: Opportunity

May 11, 2018

Today, the Center for Education Reform released second first in a series of reports exploring the case for a true transformation in education — and how to make it happen.

The Case for Education Transformation Part 2: Opportunity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A Movement of Diversity & Equity

National Charter Schools Week 2018 Day 5

The charter school movement, and many of its greatest initial and on-going successes, is rooted in its commitment to serving students who for whatever the reason have not been well-served by traditional public education. It’s greatest strength, in fact, is being able to serve students from fragile communities, in the words of former Thurgood Marshall College Fund CEO Johnny Taylor. Schools founded and often led by people of color, focused on the greatest needs of diverse populations of children, have demonstrated that with unrelenting commitment and high expectations, all students can achieve.  Numerous data report that more than half of all charter schools serve a majority minority population. That’s why on this Day 5 of #CharterSchoolsWeek we find it especially troubling that many civil rights groups have actively crusaded against charter schools. As Mother Jones reported from NAACP to Black Lives Matter leaders (though clearly not the rank and file), a serious move continues to threaten the promise and future of educational equity for all.

While it is hard to ascribe ulterior motives to the actions of their leaders, it is impossible to ignore how closely their position aligns with that of long-time charter foes – particularly the American Federation of Teachers, so close that during one of the NAACP’s “town hall” meetings on the moratorium, the president of AFT, Randi Weingarten, walked into the meeting while it was going on. The NAACP chairperson of the meeting stopped the discussion and asked everyone in the room to stand and give the AFT leader a round of applause. To say their positions align might be a bit of an understatement.

The NAACP’s stand, essentially, backs the teachers’ union charge that charters are not part of a solution to the poor quality of education in many communities of color, but are, in fact a threat to those communities. It also reinforces the explosive charge made by American Federation of Teachers president, Randi Weingarten, that education reform parents and advocates are racists akin to the southern segregationists of the past, whose real goal was to re-segregate the American education system.

This coordination of messages and efforts is clear. In political terms, it’s called a “wedge strategy:” Identify a group that is closely allied with one position – i.e. the minority community and its support for charters – and drive a wedge into that support by shifting the debate to a negative, unrelated issue – i.e. racism.

These actions have sparked outrage from African American leaders who know first-hand the value of charters as a driving force for improving education in urban settings – from Washington, DC, to Philadelphia, to New York, Los Angeles, Miami and countless other of America’s major metropolitan areas – and providing opportunities that allow children to flourish instead of founder educationally.

Just ask any one of the nearly 1,000 charter schools led by people of color represented by the National Charter Collaborative. Ask Michelle Mason, the head of the Newark Charter School Fund­, Shantelle Wright, or former Detroit superintendent and edreform leader Deborah McGriff. Ask advocate, author and K12 president Kevin Chavous, Gerard Robinson of the Center for Advancing Opportunity, Sonia Park of the Diverse Charter Schools Coalition, or any of the thousands of leaders who reengaged the quest for civil rights through education opportunity rather than succumb to a system that for decades has failed the children.

As education & civil rights warrior Howard Fuller puts it on Reality Check w/Jeanne Allen, “I just find the whole discussion to be ludicrous, bogus, uninformed and while all of that’s going on, poor black and brown children who have for years been seeking out good schools… now [that] have them in some places they are being criticized for going to a good school.”

When the NAACP moratorium hit the front pages, David Hardy, founder and chair of Boys’ Latin Philadelphia Charter School, and Donald Hense, founder and chair of Washington, D.C.’s Friendship Public Charter Schools (both members of CER’s board of directors) issued a statement calling the NAACP’s campaign against charter schools “detrimental and disrespectful to all parents who struggle to ensure a quality education for their children.

“Rather than embrace, and work to expand, the opportunities that charter schools represent to America’s disadvantaged, and to families of color across the nation, the NAACP has chosen to stand as an obstacle, and work to stifle, a movement that, for thousands of children, is the greatest — and only – hope for achieving a quality education….[its] union-driven, anti-charter school agenda, and its “model legislation” effort is an outrageous political scheme to further support the union’s agenda by undermining the voice and will of parents who are fighting for options for their children’s education and for the right and freedom to choose.”

It is these outspoken leaders who are following the Dream. You need look no further for proof of that than to study the work of Wyatt T. Walker, chief of staff to Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. who helped found New York’s first charter school and advocated for this equity-achieving reform until his last days.

Charter schools are leveling the playing field and have not only equalized opportunity for millions but introduced the innovations normally reserved for the affluent to kids from Harlem to Hawaii.

So today as we continue to celebrate National Charter Schools Week, let’s resolve to lean in with all we have on those who misinform and are misinformed. No child should be relegated to attend any school based on zip code, and no parent forced to accept that which fails their children simply because that’s the way it was.

“But You’ve Got to Have FRIENDS”

National Charter Schools Week 2018 Day 4

Some of the earliest founded charter school advocacy groups had friends in their name, and for good reason. They wanted to be what most of us aspire to be in all walks of like – great friends to the new kid on the block.

Friends of Choice in Urban Schools was the first city-based organization to be formed. FOCUS was – and is – devoted to expanding opportunities for students, and particularly those in charter schools.  Friendship Public Charter Schools was the first community-based network to develop to support at-risk students in DC and remains one of the pioneers in successful community based, African-American led networks, which happens to lead in educational attainment and innovation, too.

The national leader at the time was Charter Friends National Network, started by our “friends” in Minnesota and devoted “from 1996 to March of 2004, to supporting state-level charter support organizations.” That group was part of a coalition that included CER and other national leaders that explored how best to coordinate our efforts nationally. Eventually the decision was made, with some pressure by foundations, to evolve into the National Alliance for Public Charter Schools.

But most of the friends of charter schools are largely unknown and unsung heroes who don’t show up on the conference circuit or in the press or get bandied around by all the pundits and newsletters. Yet it is they who are responsible for the movement’s growth in encouraging and supporting these amazing opportunities for kids. Sarah Tantillo is one of those friends, whose leadership in the 90s in NJ catapulted that unlikely union state to become one of the earliest for charters. Our CEO Jeanne Allen discussed her work then and her recent book about the movement on this special podcast for #CharterSchoolsWeek.

At that time, charter schools were incubators for innovation, flexibility, experimentation and new ideas for how best to deliver quality education to children and there was a growing group of people – hundreds – putting their great ideas to the test, and to work for children. 

Today, those very tenets that these friends helped secure for our kids are under siege, some within the movement and some, as we discussed yesterday, from without.

This phenomenon has been articulated by many individually, and collectively in Charting a New Course: The Case for Freedom, Flexibility and Opportunity through Charter Schools, the result of the work of researchers, policy analysts and thought leaders who have been evaluating the activities and reactions of the educational choice frontier for many years. As our experts describe in the multi-essay publication, there are friends that have become enamored of the system, who seek to ensure they arrive at higher quality educational options by giving government structures more authority to decide what schools may open and what schools must close be using standardized test-scores largely to make data-driven decisions.

Then there are friends, much like the original charter pioneers, who trust parents more than bureaucrats when it comes to determining school quality. They want to see a more open and dynamic system, where there is greater freedom for educational entrepreneurs to open new schools and for parents to decide which schools should close and which should expand based on whether they want to send their children there.

System-centered friends have contributed to what is called “institutional isomorphism” in the charter sector—the tendency of charter schools to look and act more and more like the traditional schools they were intended to substantively supplement. Charter schools were supposed to offer a wider array of options, to help parents find schools based on the educational approach that fits their child best.  Today, in terms of financial support and organizational infrastructure, system-centered reformers have the upper hand. Their arguments are straightforward: we know “what works” to produce a charter sector that “outperforms” traditional public schools. Policymakers, eager to show that they’re pro- “accountability,” are increasingly adopting system-centered reforms. But student-centered reformers are more plentiful and as results from among the states lead by student-centered reformers come in – Arizona and Florida to name just two – there is thankfully that needed pendulum swing happening again among our friends.

Charters remain a beacon of innovation and opportunity and today more than ever they need friends united in the quest and the notion that there is no one size fits all that works for kids, schools or accountability, and that the core principles of the charter movement must be centered on the students, and their individualized needs if we are to succeed for the millions in and waiting to get into charter schools. It may be harder and more difficult to measure individual progress, but with good friends, anything is possible.

The UNIONS, and their impact on Teachers

National Charter Schools Week 2018 Day 3

Recognizing charter schools as well as those who enable their progress on this #TeachersDay 2018 must include a recognition of those that stand in the way of yet more progress- the National Education Association and the exceptionally hostile American Federation of Teachers (AFT).

It’s no secret these two groups have always opposed and spread falsehoods about charters, working hard to convince teachers that they don’t serve kids. That has largely failed, but lately, the rhetoric and attacks by the union bosses have taken a troubling, destructive turn. Their increased hostility can only be a result of one thing – a threat to their power. Charter schools have gained strength and acceptance across the nation, threatening the unions’ power, influence, money and membership. NEA membership declined in 27 states last year. The AFT membership fell by 69,000 in 2016. And within a few short weeks, the US Supreme Court will decide in Janus vs AFSCME if the US constitution intended for union fees to be involuntarily extracted from the nation’s teachers. (We think our Founders did not).

But rather than evolve and adapt to changes in the 180-year-old factory model system of education, rather than create a new path for teachers that supports their growth over mandating uniformity and lock step acceptance of rules, they have dug in their heels and decided character assassination and anti-charter propaganda is best, even declaring unfathomably that the charter school movement is rooted in racism and in the Jim Crow politics of the South’s past!

Over at their palatial building on 16th Street, NW in Washington the NEA has been sending missives out to teachers based on last year’s policy statement that – in the union mind and the union mind only – it “jeopardize[s] student success, undermines public education and harms communities” and thus they must “arm our communities and our educational professionals with the tools and voice we all need to ensure a better future for our youth.”

Of course, those tools should be making sure every child gets a great education no matter what the vehicle, but that would never occur to a union who derives its power from mandatory assignment and forced membership.

As absurd and as unfounded as their comments and actions are, they must not go unchallenged.  Nor should we ignore that they have tried to tie their school-funding/teacher-pay protests to charters. Make no mistake, these walkouts, sickouts and strikes are intended to build their union, pushing charter school teachers to follow them. Many have called them out in the news and in podcasts with important education leaders.

The good news is that there is help for charter schools and their teachers who want to resist the forced actions of unions to take over these life-saving schools.

x1325x329_MathsPhysicsGeographyP20HeroP20hub_0.jpg.jpg

The really good news however is that teachers love the autonomy and focus that charters allow them to teach and innovate without being bound by union rules that only hamstring those efforts. That’s why well over 90% of charter schools remain non-union and, as a result, retain the freedoms and flexibilities entailed in that independence. As such, charter schools continue to outperform traditional public schools at a rate that has helped drive advances in learning and pedagogy. Charter schools change lives, thanks to the teachers in them. And today, on Teacher Appreciation day as well as Day 3 of #CharterSchoolsWeek, that’s worth celebrating!

Keys to Success for Charter Schools Include Strong Legislators & Strong Laws

National Charter Schools Week 2018 Day 2

Each year National Charter Schools Week gives charter advocates an opportunity not only to bring further attention to chartering and the myriad benefits it offers our children but to the elements critical for success. Let’s start the week with one major one – legislators.

Having the dedicated support of legislators as charter champions and policymakers dedicated to drafting strong charter laws that allow charter schools to maximize their reach and effectiveness is a major key. And, although there are current and former legislators who continue to push for increasing opportunity equity, autonomy and expansion of existing charter schools and construction of new ones, finding these champions is becoming a growing problem in many states.

Entrenched special interest groups wield an outsized influence when it comes to drafting legislative and developing policy. This, combined with campaigns to erode public support for charters and other reforms to expand education opportunities – and demonize their advocates – have had a chilling effect on elected officials in many states who don’t want to jeopardize their seats, or make their re-election more difficult by taking on the status quo.

This often leads “reformers” to seek out a legislative path of least resistance that will placate pro-charters people without antagonizing well-organized anti-charter forces. Unfortunately, such compromises typically lead to laws that are so diminished, or restrictive, that they do more to stifle charter growth than to encourage it.

A recent example of this can be found in Kentucky where lawmakers started out quite strong in support for a strong charter law but became skittish when it was suggested that the law might be unconstitutional (it wasn’t) and then, fears over authorizers were raised; then, there was the question of a budget. The result:  a weak, watered-down charter law that severely limits charter school authorizers, doesn’t provide funding for the schools and now, more than a year later, there is no solution in sight.

Of course, Kentucky is not alone and that’s the bigger problem. Too many state legislators believe that starting incrementally and growing strong over time is a great strategy, and do not want to spend the time and effort it takes to fight the status quo and craft the right policy to start. They believe that they can improve it over time. But that only happens when the law starts with the right building blocks – authorizers, autonomy, and funding.  And once a law is adopted, legislators are loath to admit that it is less than it should be and adopt an attitude of  “Our work is done here” in order to avoid the effort, and controversy, entailed in fixing problems of their own creation. Consequently, weak laws – and all the stifling impediments to charter growth that they create – tend to stay on the books, relatively unchanged, for years.

This, or course, isn’t always the case. Florida is an example of a dedicated, determined legislature that keeps the health of charters schools and other education opportunity initiatives at the top of its agenda. The state recently adopted a sweeping education bill that allows new Schools of Hope to be created out of the 208 failing schools in the state, as well as provided for direct funding for charter schools in recent months. House Speaker Richard Corcoran has fought lawsuits, proposals to reduce funding, add red tape and more, and each time his leadership stands as a model for how legislating can protect all schools from the intrusion of the education establishment, or the Blob.

On the other hand, as Success Academy founder Eva Moskowitz reports on this week’s Reality Check w/Jeanne Allen, policymakers who fall prey to charter opponents have allowed 17,000 students to be placed on waiting lists for her great schools. Had they the courage to follow Florida’s lead, they might be afforded the hope of accessing one of many new options that would open up if there were authority to provide more seats.

Or they could look to Arizona, whose new and increased student-centered funding extends across all public school students, including to charter school students – who are no less public because they attend a different kind of public school. Committed legislators make sure to include charter schools whenever there are important equities to be had.

cer-site-assets-2018rankings-collage.jpg

It’s no secret what makes a strong law. CER has been researching, analyzing and reporting on it for 25 years!

It can be done. Legislators will listen, and will respond, especially if the chorus of voices is large enough and loud enough. It’s easy to learn how to sing when your choir includes a litany of great activists and policymakers who’ve done the hard work of figuring it all out – like Moskowitz, Governor Jeb Bush, Senator Michael Bennet, Governor Charlie Baker, Kevin Chavous, Dr. Howard Fuller…. These and thousands more are in the choir legislators need to hear.

Opportunities Under Siege – National Charter Schools Week 2018: An Open Letter from Jeanne Allen


National Charter Schools Week 2018

In the 27+ years since the founding of the charter school movement, tremendous progress has been made in the number of schools established, and in the wealth of innovative opportunities they offer to children, families, teachers and communities. In the 25 years CER has been leading the fight for innovation and opportunity in education, we’ve been privy to the best hearts and minds that one could ever hope to bring together under one tent to serve children and expand educational excellence.

They make up the world’s most dedicated advocates – parents, policy advocates, legislators – and some of brightest minds in the areas of education technology, pedagogy, curriculum, teaching and learning has helped create a vibrant community of charters. When we first started celebrating  National Charter Schools Week with events on Capitol Hill and in every city, it was still a novel idea. The power of that idea now has seen a payoff for children and families that has catalyzed cities, improved communities and created life changing futures for students once relegated only to failing schools.

So why then, tell me, do so many members of the education establishment not want to break out of their comfort and ideological rigidity and embrace a cause that has paved the way for innovations in teaching and learning? Why did they ignore the data that saw charter school achievement for the most needing of students soaring in many states on this year’s Nation’s Report Card and instead, dedicated their money, time and public relations army to convincing teachers to abandon their work and walk out of union and non-union schools alike?  Why are those same teachers unions trying to create unrest in the largest and most successful network of public charter schools, the Alliance College Ready Public Schools, even after 3 years of trying, 10 lawsuits and thousands of home visits have still turned up short of those committed teachers wanting to unionizes their successful independent public schools?

I’ll tell you why. Because even despite chronic underfunding and a constant misinformation campaign and attack by opponents of charters and education transformation, more than 7,000 charters serve more than three million children in urban, suburban and even a few rural communities across the country. Together with waiting lists over one million nationwide, and engaged adults and staffs around those kids that are close to 20 million all in, this is a movement that was once considered unthinkable but that is now unstoppable.

We are tri-partisan, we are mixed in race, creed and color, we are diverse in socio-economics and occupation and we count among us visionaries, parents, public servants, politicians, activists, lawyers, doctors, working class, poor and just plain old fashioned committed folks.

Together we believe that all children deserve a great education and we aim to make sure they get it.

Together we know that learning is a natural phenomenon and schools built around it will ensure the achievement of learners.

Together we believe that uniformity of educational pedagogy, pay scales or expected performance only produced mediocrity, at best.

Together, we believe that no child should be forced to attend a school against their wishes and because of where they were born.

Together we believe that those closest to our kids know best and that with parents engaged, educators, school leaders and community leaders know best how to serve our students.

Together, we know that the traditional factory model of education is to schooling today what landlines are to mobile phones. And together we have and will continue to fight to ensure that better education is accessible to every child, every learner, at every level.

We know that charter school students surpass their traditional public school counterparts in key areas of learning and proficiency. We know that the safe, supportive learning environments that charter schools provide makes them a far-and-away better choice for parents than many troubled traditional public schools. We know that traditional education changes when they are pressured with the availability of other options. And we know that when charter schools do not meet expectations or the provisions of their charter, they can be and are closed, something that seldomly occurs in the 180 year old system that is designed so that no matter what their performance, they remain open.

To our dear friends and allies and the many thousands who toil daily to work in, create, support and advance charter schools, we must band together even more to recommit ourselves to the strong policies and programs that put charter schools on the map and have given millions of students over the years a path to the future. For despite our success we are under siege.

This past year we have witnessed the unthinkable. A union boss race baiting over charter schools, the NAACP calling for their moratorium, school districts denying funding and fighting to recapture control.

There are legislators who refuse to fund laws they pass, or set bureaucratic limitations on the power of charter schools to set their own course for success. They fear political risks, and fewer and fewer legislators are willing to stand four-square behind the boldest of charter school policies – those that create the kinds of educational success we see in Arizona, Florida, and Indiana, to name just three. Best to keep your head down and placate the powerful special interests than to take the bold steps needed to deliver real reform via strong charter laws. Then there are those, including some mayors, who fear nothing and simply believe that their old tired and worn allegiances with big union money power are the only cause worth fighting for.

On the other side of the ledger, we have witnessed in recent years the well-intentioned but damaging work of those allies who help those legislators, or create those rules and believe that state-required and imperfect standards and assessments are superior judges of educational success.  Their “we know more than you and your parents” mindset has been on a downward spiralthat is discouraging the creation of innovative schools, new entrants to leadership and teaching, and the creativity that charters once protected better than any other educational entity.

If we shed the obstacles that bind limit our reach, our power and our work we can transform education for learners at all levels. The opportunities for education in this 21st global century are boundless. And necessary. As Jefferson argued “no other sure foundation can be devised for the preservation of freedom and happiness.”

There is much to celebrate. This week we will bring you stories of success, captivating interviews with charter leaders, and data to bolster your arguments. Cheer them on, but remember they are under siege. We must fight for them, and remove the obstacles to the charter idea reaching more people. Only that way will the children be well and prosper.

Newswire – May 1, 2018

INNOVATION GOES TO CAPITOL HILL. Education Innovation. We’ve been talking about it since early 2016 and its necessity as part of the larger equation – Innovation PLUS Opportunity = Results. For several months CER has introduced education innovation to Washington in individual meetings and provided guidance to federal officials on who they might want to listen to if they are to ensure competency-based education replaces seat time in the quest for education mastery.

Enter Kelly Young of EducationReimagined, and Julia Freeland Fisherof the Clayton Christensen Institutewho led a riveting and necessary conversation on how Congress can help drive opportunity and innovation in teaching and learning. As Ms. Fisher offered a packed room of intrigued Hill staffers during the meeting, we must consider how “we have the tools to start to re-choreograph the classroom in the 21st century.” The current system is not designed to produce 21st century results and doesn’t promote a “learner-centered education,” said Ms. Young. Her group’s goal? To design a progressive system that ensures a learner-centered environment. There’s proof that it works. Jemar Lee, a student at IowaBIG was on hand to share his experience; at a high school where students help solve community issues through passion projects, he found success after having been discouraged and disengaged in a traditional model school. He explained how a policy that allows learner-centered environments to thrive will be one that produces personalized models specific to individual communities and economies. The message to Congress? Legislating and spending with rules and regulations that value seat time over accomplishment deter progress and innovation.

The reason personalized learning can and should be happening?

“We have tools to allow us to re-choreograph the classroom, we no longer have to limit student outcomes to whatever teachers have time to accomplish with their students in a classroom. Online learning isn’t necessarily a silver bullet.  How is technology getting integrated into classrooms, so teachers have more time for small group and individual instruction; how is technology unlocking various pathways so that students can learn fully online outside of school and inside school? And policy has a big role to play there.” (Fisher)

“What learner-centered education is all about is how do we empower young people? It assumes all learners are capable, curious and wondrous, that learning is actually a natural phenomenon and kids don’t have to be forced to do it. If kids are in a place where they’re not learning… it’s not because they don’t want to. It might be that they’re suffering from trauma, that they might have been so brutalized by the current climate of a compliance-based system, that all curiosity has left them temporarily, but it can all be restored. 

“Learners are unique….so how do we actually treat individuals like individuals, not just based on their academics but based on their interests, the language they speak, their brain wiring. It sounds complex, but actually we can design these systems that accommodate everybody. Once we realize that learning is natural…we would design a competency-based system, a system that isn’t time-based. It’s personalized, relevant, and contextualized – that the content of learning is no longer standardized.” (Young)

Interested in joining the Innovation Roadshow? Write to us here and tell us how we can work together!

HIGH MARKS FOR ONLINE HIGHER ED.  A new study from Arizona State University reports that online courses may be just what it takes to help retain students and keep them on the path to graduation. According to EducationDive, “Retention and completion rates would seem to be higher among students in online learning courses because there are fewer metrics that could contribute to low performance in coursework.” But the news piece cautions that making online courses engaging and meaningful require a close look at design. Although the study is small, the results are promising.

TRANSFORMING ED IN RURAL AMERICA.  Music to our ears. The drum beat continues new approaches to help address limitations in human capital and overcome distance barriers to allow rural communities to have access to exceptional education. According Digital Learning Strategies for Rural America, “… online and blended learning has been helping students and schools in many ways.” The report includes case studies of 15 states and programs to demonstrate policies, districts and schools that are using digital learning to meet rural education needs.

DID YOU SEE IT?  ‘How Ed Tech Can Save Rural America’ was the focus of a robust discussion at the ASU+GSV annual summit earlier this month.

THE REVOLUTION IS COMING.  According to the latest Reality Check with Jeanne Allen an education revolution is already here and it’s going global. Find out what it took for Laura Sandefur and her husband Jeff to abandon traditional schools, take the plunge and turn learning upside down. In 2009, they founded Acton Academy with just 15 students, and today with more than 80 campuses around the world, Acton Academy is considered one of the most innovative K-12 school models. Laura’s take on traditional education? “It’s not only broken, it’s irrelevant!” Hear more https://edreform.com/realitycheck/

ICYMI.  The teacher strike continues in Arizona. Somehow Gov. Doug Ducey’s plan “20×2020” calling for 20% teacher pay raises over two years and restoring recession-era cuts to K-12 funding isn’t good enough. Fanning the flames of unrest, and calling for another day of strikes, AFT president Randi Weingarten joined the Arizona rally Monday. Schools statewide remain closed Tuesday including the two largest districts in the state, Mesa Public Schools and the Tucson Unified School District.

Read more about the national situation here, and here.

Newswire – April 24, 2018

UNIONS STAGE WALKOUTS. In case you hadn’t heard, the national teachers’ unions are staging/pushing for teacher walk outs across the country. In case theyhadn’t heard, the nation’s report card says less than 50 percent of our kids are proficient in the basics – with the percentages being dramatically less if you’re a minority or at-risk student. The exception to this persistent years-long rule can be found in the states that have seen dramatically more opportunities offered to kids…

LIKE ARIZONA — where charter students boast larger NAEP gains than any state. Ironically, despite this success, teachers are being pressured to walk out, even among the leading charter schools. This was anything but organic – In fact, West Virginia labor leaders claim to have inspired Arizona’s walk out this week.

BUT IN COLORADO…  Scores have remained stagnant and the achievement gap unacceptably wide. In fact, Colorado is near the bottom of states in making progress in closing that gap. Despite that, teachers across Colorado are also planning walkouts. Their gripe is funding. It should be achievement.

A friend in Colorado shared a letter from the Douglas County School District, excerpted below.

“…teachers across Colorado are attending rallies at the State Capitol later this week to call for increased education funding. Many districts decided late last week to close school on either Thursday, April 26 or Friday, April 27. We have been monitoring time-off requests carefully over the last few days. Yesterday, requests increased significantly, such that there are not enough substitutes in the system to cover all classrooms across our district.

“As a result, our neighborhood, magnet and alternative schools will be closed on Thursday, April 26. District charter schools, that manage their own staffing, will remain open and operating on a normal schedule. [Editors note:  we would like to repeat that last sentence. “District charter schools, that manage their own staffing, will remain open and operating on a normal schedule.”] …we recognize that this presents challenges for many of our families. However, with over 500 of our educators out, we will simply not be able to provide a safe and effective learning environment for all of our students.

“WANT TO KNOW WHEY THEY ARE STRIKING?” According to the Denver Post It’s about pay and benefits and spending of course.  (The Post doesn’t mention the four-day school week that more than half of schools now have in CO, by the way.) Nor is there coverage anywhere about the “School-Staffing Surge,” the phenomenon that has dominated US public schools for more than 50 years. It goes like this: “Public schools grew staffing at a rate four times faster than the increase in students over that time period. Of those personnel, teachers’ numbers increased 252 percent while administrators and other staff experienced growth of 702 percent, more than seven times the increase in students.” And the number of teachers since prior to NCLB have grown more than twice that of students!

BUT THERE’S MORE TO IT THAN EVEN THAT.  We agree that “There’s an important conversation to be had about teacher pay, benefit costs, and how to attract and honor terrific teachers — and pay fairly professionals who put in a solid day’s work,” as one of the nation’s leading education policy experts Frederick Hess of the American Enterprise Institute posits. “And, like many, we think the gains that Oklahoma’s teachers have now won are reasonable and appropriate.

But it appears that, even more than in the case of West Virginia — where teachers returned to work with a comparatively Spartan 5 percent pay bump — Oklahoma’s walkout is quickly becoming detached from efforts to ensure that dollars are spent responsibly. When teachers who have already claimed a massive win are shuttering schools over demands for retiree cost-of-living-adjustments and the need to “staff-up” other state agencies, it seems farfetched to say that student concerns are still front and center.”

Let’s be clear: The unions want to make teacher pay a defining issue. But it’s not, or at least it shouldn’t be. The defining issue is educational excellence. Pay should not simply be an award for time spent at a job. But few teachers are paid for their success or for being great educators. They’re paid for their longevity, based on fixed pay scales designed to achieve “fairness” instead of reward excellence. It’s a system that’s been legislated and lobbied for by the unions (and which has helped massively in sustaining the unions) who are now urging protests – not to improve education, or reward excellence – but to, simply, increase teacher pay.

FINALLY, IN PUERTO RICO TOMORROW…  teachers will walk out to protest not pay but the introduction of choices for kids trapped in failing schools. These walkouts are hardly spontaneous uprisings by local teachers. Indeed, AFT President Randi Weingarten was overheard “…plotting a teachers’ strike to shut down schools in Puerto Rico…” Yes, you heard it right, as did all her fellow Amtrak passengers who were able to hear her surprisingly unguarded cellphone conversation with an unknown co-conspirator. The gist of the story is that Weingarten was calling for teachers to use personal and sick days, not for their intended purposes, but to stage a strike, which she cautioned should not be called a “strike” but, rather, union members serving as “human shields for kids.” Read about it here.

ONE MORE THING.  These latest union-led shenanigans are, in part, what the Janus case that’s before the U.S. Supreme Court (and Friedrichs before that) is all about. If you’re a teacher and you don’t agree with what the union is doing, and how it’s using the money it takes from you in dues: tough!  You have to pay up anyway. A ruling in favor of Janus would change that miscarriage of fairness and justice.